Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Given two witnesses, A and B, if recensio demonstrates that B is a direct descendant of A (which means that it contains all the errors of A plus at least one more error (cf. Maas 1960, § 8) – of a kind that does not imply a different filiation than A (cf. Timpanaro 1981, p. 120), B is a codex descriptus and therefore useless in a reconstructive perspective. Yet, such a codex can provide important information as far as the history of textual transmission is concerned.


  • Maas, Paul. 1960. Textkritik. 4th ed. Leipzig: Teubner. – First ed. 1927.
  • Timpanaro, Sebastiano. 1981. La genesi del metodo del Lachmann. 2nd ed. Torino: Liviana. – First ed., Firenze: Le Monnier, 1963.

In other languages




  • No labels