...

We are now ready to plot the result and compare it to the scattering transform computed using the

Lippmann-Schwinger equation approach. Run the file t_plot.m, and you should see something like this:

Note how the magenta line (computed using the boundary integral equation) diverges for |k|>8.

However, the values of the magenta line for k near zero are very accurate.

...

## Reconstruction from scattering transform using the D-bar method

Now we are ready to reconstruct the conductivity. Download the routines tBIErecon_comp.m and DB_oper.m,

and run *tBIErecon_comp.m*.

You can look at the reconstruction using the routine recon_plot.m. You should see something like this:

Here we used R=4, so the reconstruction is not very close to the original. Try setting M=8 and R=7 in *tBIErecon_comp.m* and see what *recon_plot.m* produces then.

Note carefully that although we used the rotational symmetry of the conductivity to speed up some of the above

computations, the solution of the D-bar equation is a two-dimensional process, not one-dimensional.

We did choose the reconstruction points along the positive x1-axis for convenience, but any planar point x

could be chosen. Also, note that the reconstruction at one x point is completely independent from the reconstruction

at another point, so the D-bar method allows region-of-interest imaging and trivial parallellization.

You can experiment with the truncation radius R. When you use tBIE computed using the boundary integral equation,

you can take R up to 7 with no problems. However, when R is so large that the bad-quality parts of the above magenta

plot are being used, the reconstruction will be bad.

You can take the experiment further by using tLS instead of tBIE; then you can push the reconstruction to higher

values of R. Also, you can replace the low-quality tLS values near k=0 with the higher-quality tBIE.