Wiki-palvelun osoite wiki.helsinki.fi muuttuu wiki-emerita.it.helsinki.fi -osoitteeksi 4.12.2023 – katso lisätietoja tiedotteestamme: https://flamma.helsinki.fi/s/1uCkV
The Wiki address wiki.helsinki.fi will change to wiki-emerita.it.helsinki.fi on 4 December 2023 – see more information on Flamma: https://flamma.helsinki.fi/s/sreoE
Wiki-tjänstens adress wiki.helsinki.fi ändras till wiki-emerita.it.helsinki.fi 4.12.2023 – läs mer i vårt meddelande: https://flamma.helsinki.fi/s/fe3MT
A codex descriptus (plural codices descripti) is a copy of another (extant) manuscript. Given two extant witnesses, A and B, : if recensio demonstrates that B is a direct descendant of descends from A, which means that it contains all the errors of A plus at least one more error Eigenfehler (cf. Maas 1960, § 8) – , i.e. one of a kind that does not imply a different filiation than A (cf. Timpanaro 1981, p. 120), B is a codex descriptus and therefore useless in a reconstructive perspective. Yetfor the reconstruction of the archetype. Nonetheless, such a codex can provide important information as far as the history of textual transmission is concerned. It is often difficult to irrevocably prove that a codex is entirely a descriptus.
In Latin descriptus means 'copied, transcribed' from the verb de-scribōscrībō.
References
- – Maas, Paul. 1960. Textkritik. 4th ed. Leipzig: Teubner. – First ed. 1927.
- Timpanaro– Timpanaro, Sebastiano. 1981. La genesi del metodo del Lachmann. 2nd ed. TorinoPadova: Liviana. – First – 1st ed., Firenze: Le Monnier, 1963.
– ———. 2005. The Genesis of Lachmann’s Method. Translated by Glenn W. Most. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. – Translated from Timpanaro 1981.
In other languages
The Latin term is used throughout.
MB